Veracode vs Checkmarx vs Cycode: 3 Key Differences, Pros & Cons, and How to Choose the Best Solution

Application Security Testing (AST) tools are essential to ensure your applications are secure from weaknesses and vulnerabilities. When evaluating AST tools, teams often consider Veracode and Checkmarx. This page compares Veracode and Checkmarx exploring their respective core capabilities, key differences, strengths, and weaknesses to help you make an informed decision. 

For enterprises requiring a complete solution that combines superior scanning capabilities (including SAST, SCA, Secrets, and more) with integrations and platform extensibility, read on to the end to learn why Cydode’s Complete Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) platform may be the best Veracode and Checkmarx alternative for your needs.

What is Cycode?

Cycode is a Complete Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) platform. It combines native application security testing (SAST, SCA, IaC, and Container) and pipeline security scanning (Secrets, Code Leak Detection, CI/CD) with extensive third-party integrations, deep risk intelligence (including exposure path analysis and owner mapping), and automated remediation to shorten the lifecycle of high-risk vulnerabilities at scale.

For enterprises managing risk across complex environments, Cycode consolidates and supplements security tools to deliver more resilience and a lower cost of ownership.

What is Veracode?

Veracode is a comprehensive AST suite designed for enterprises. Its foundations are in Binary Static Analysis (SAST) and the offering has expanded to provide dynamic analysis (DAST) and SCA to identify vulnerabilities throughout the software development lifecycle. 

Veracode’s focus on security policies and compliance makes it a popular choice for security teams and organizations with stringent security requirements.

What is Checkmarx?

Checkmarx is an enterprise-focused application security platform. It has expanded from its foundations in Static Analysis (SAST) to build out its platform offering across Code, Cloud, and Software Supply Chain Security. 

Checkmarx’s focus on governance and policy enforcement during development and throughout the application lifecycle caters to enterprise security teams.

 

Feature Cycode Veracode Checkmarx
AST Coverage SAST, SCA, IaC, and Container SAST, SCA SAST, SCA, IaC, and Container
Pipeline & Secrets Best-in-class secrets security across SDLC, collaboration, and other developer tools Lacks secrets and pipeline security Limited secrets security
Software Supply Chain Security Dependency, SBOM, and CI/CD security Limited to dependency Limited to dependency
Platform Integrations Extensive integrations into SDLC tools and seamless developer experience CI/CD and fragmented IDE integrations with poor developer experience Supports SCMs and developer tools, but lacks full SDLC coverage
ASPM Extensive third-party integrations and connect any tool with ConnectorX Via acquisition with limited implementation and integrations No documentation of third-party scanner support
Best For Enterprises seeking complete visibility and risk reduction across code, supply chain, secrets, and more Security teams focused on policy management or coverage of legacy languages Security teams focusing on traditional AST

Key Features of Cycode

Cycode’s strengths lie in its high-quality native AST and pipeline security suite augmented by extensive integrations with third-party scanners and SDLC tools. This unifies visibility and taps into deep context to power risk-based prioritization and rapid remediation of software vulnerabilities at scale.

  • Proprietary Pipeline & AST Scanning: Secure code, software supply chains, and pipelines including detection of exposed secrets across all developer tools
  • Third-Party Integration: Unified visibility, prioritization, and remediation across any security ecosystem via ConnectorX
  • Risk Intelligence Graph & Change Impact Analysis: Risk-based prioritization with exposure path analysis and proactive assessment of every code c